VeryDarkMan Re-Arraigned for Cyberbullying Iyabo Ojo, Tonto Dikeh, Samklef, Others

The Nigeria Police Force re-arraigned controversial social media influencer Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), before Justice Musa Liman of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, charging him with cyberbullying prominent Nollywood actresses Iyabo Ojo, Tonto Dikeh, music producer Samuel Oguachuba (Samklef), and others. The case, which has drawn significant public attention, underscores the growing scrutiny of online conduct under Nigeria’s cybercrime laws.

VDM, a polarizing figure known for his outspoken commentary on social media, faced a five-count charge accusing him of violating Section 24 of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015. The charges relate to a series of alleged defamatory and harassing posts made on his Instagram handle (@verydarkblackman) between October 2023 and March 2024. He pleaded not guilty to all counts.

Details of the Charges

The prosecution, led by Victor Okoye, outlined the following allegations:

• Count 1: On October 13, 2023, VDM allegedly posted a video containing threatening and bullying remarks targeting Samklef, with the intent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, or harm.
• Count 2: On October 29, 2023, he allegedly shared videos accusing Iyabo Ojo of engaging in an indecent sexual relationship with her daughter, content deemed offensive, obscene, and pornographic.
• Count 3: On January 19, 2024, VDM allegedly falsely claimed that Tonto Dikeh misappropriated crowdfunding funds for the Justice for Mohbad Movement and operated the Gistlover blog, a popular gossip platform, with intent to defame her.
• Count 4: On March 19, 2024, he allegedly posted videos insulting Deputy Inspectors General of Police and members of the National Assembly, aiming to cause harm or distress.
• Count 5: Also on March 19, 2024, VDM allegedly claimed that crossdresser Bobrisky was pimping young boys for Senators and senior police officers, an accusation intended to provoke breach of peace and harm.

These charges build on earlier legal actions against VDM, who was first arraigned on May 22, 2024, before Justice Mobolaji Olajuwon on similar cybercrime allegations. That case saw him remanded in prison until he met bail conditions on June 10, 2024.

Court Proceedings and Bail

During Wednesday’s hearing, VDM’s counsel, Deji Adeyanju, urged the court to allow his client to continue on the bail previously granted by Justice Olajuwon. The earlier bail terms required a ₦10 million bond, two sureties (either reputable private sector employees or federal civil servants at Level 17), and evidence of three years’ tax clearance for both the defendant and sureties. The prosecution did not oppose the request, and Justice Liman upheld the existing bail conditions, allowing VDM to remain free pending trial.

The court adjourned the case to July 24, 2025, for the commencement of trial, setting the stage for a high-profile legal battle that could shape the enforcement of cybercrime laws in Nigeria.

Background and Context

VDM’s legal troubles have intensified in recent months, with the influencer facing multiple accusations of defamation and cyberbullying. His outspoken critiques of celebrities, politicians, and public figures have earned him a massive following but also drawn the ire of those he targets. The current charges involve some of Nollywood’s biggest names, including Iyabo Ojo and Tonto Dikeh, who have publicly clashed with VDM over his allegations.

The case also touches on broader issues, such as the Justice for Mohbad Movement, which seeks accountability for the death of singer Mohbad, and the operations of gossip platforms like Gistlover. VDM’s claims about Tonto Dikeh’s involvement in these matters have fueled heated online debates.

Additionally, VDM was recently released from the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over unrelated fraud allegations, further complicating his legal battles. His supporters argue that he is being targeted for exposing powerful figures, while critics contend that his actions cross legal and ethical lines.

Public Reaction and Implications

The re-arraignment has sparked widespread discussion on social media platforms, particularly on X, where opinions are sharply divided. Some users defend VDM as a whistleblower holding celebrities accountable, while others condemn his methods as reckless and harmful. The case highlights the tension between free speech and the legal boundaries of online conduct in Nigeria, where cybercrime laws are increasingly invoked to address defamation and harassment.

As the trial approaches, all eyes will be on the Federal High Court to see how Justice Liman navigates the complex interplay of law, celebrity culture, and social media influence. The outcome could set a precedent for how cyberbullying cases are prosecuted in Nigeria, particularly when they involve public figures and sensitive allegations.

For now, VDM remains free on bail, but the road to July 2025 promises to be fraught with legal and public scrutiny.