The Senate Committee has taken a decisive stance on Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, dismissing it due to procedural invalidity. The committee’s decision was based on the Senate’s rules, which dictate that a senator cannot present a petition personally signed by themselves.

A Matter of Procedure

During the plenary session, Senator Tahir Munguno emphasized the importance of adhering to the Senate’s rules to avoid “chaos and anarchy.” He pointed out that Natasha’s petition was personally signed by her, which contravenes the Senate’s rules. Munguno’s argument was upheld by the Senate, leading to the rejection of the petition.

Sub Judice

Furthermore, Munguno noted that the matter was already before the courts, making it sub judice and ineligible for deliberation by the Senate. This added another layer of complexity to the petition, ultimately contributing to its dismissal.

Natasha’s Attempt to Invoke Order 10

Despite the Senate’s decision, Natasha attempted to invoke Order 10, which allows any senator to rise and speak at any time. However, her efforts were unsuccessful, as the Senate ultimately upheld the argument of the Senate Leader and rejected the petition.

Conclusion

The Senate Committee’s decision to dismiss Natasha’s petition against Akpabio highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules and guidelines. The petition’s rejection serves as a reminder that the Senate must operate within the bounds of its rules and regulations, ensuring that all matters are addressed in a fair and orderly manner.